Ian,
Use of the SATRA S-XTBT depends upon having access to certain belt tension data/ specs provided by the engine manufacturer. Unfortunately, Lotus never used that method of setting tension, and therefore never published the required data.
The Satra works on the premise that for a given force applied perpendicular to the belt at mid-span, the belt will deflect a certain distance. For instance, a typical spec might be that for an applied force of 52-57 N-m, the correctlly tensioned belt will deflect 2mm. It's that sort of data that you must know before you can use the Satra, and it's that information that Lotus has never published.
Here's a Youtube video on how to use the Satra. It's 22 minutes, and in the end, just tells you what I wrote above. With out the Force Vs Deflection specs for the Lotus timing belts, you can't use the Satra.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf-zgjyEcMs
The video link AndyC posted is a short version of the same video, starting at the 18:57 point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf-zgjyEcMs&t=1132s
It's possible to 'back into' the required Force Vs Deflection spec; but first, someone with a proper (and recently calibrated) Lotus tension gauge (Burroughs BT-33-86J, or Clavis Frequency Meter for the HTD belt only) is going to have to take the initiative to do the work. First, accurately set the belt's tension to Lotus spec, then immediately take a tension reading with the Satra. Using the result, back through the math/ logic to get to a Force Vs Deflection spec for that combination.
The same was true for the Krikit KR1. If you apply one to a correctly tensioned 9XX timing belt, it will not yield the same reading as the Burroughs. Back in the early-mid 1990s, Ian in Canada and myself, working independently, did similar correlation work for the KR1. Later, when we learned of each other's efforts, we compared results and found that they agreed. So I started promoting the KR1 on early mailing lists as an inexpensive alternative to the Burroughs.
You're now in the same situation with the Satra, in that it has not been calibrated for the Lotus 9XX applications. And as was done for the Krikit, someone is going to have to make the effort to determine a corelation for the Satra. Once that is done, it will probably be a reasonable alternative to the Burroughs. But today, NO, the Force Vs Deflection spec for the 9XX belts hasn't been published, so you can't use the Satra to tension the belt.
Note that the Satra is thickness sensitive, and the HTD belt is thicker than the trapezoidal belt... and the new Gates Blue belt is thicker yet. It will be necessary to correlate Satra Force Vs Deflection for each belt. Once that's done, it might be a dumb stroke of luck that all three are so close that the difference can be ignored, and one common spec used. That's wishful thinking, and it would be very unwise to simply do the correlation on one belt, and then presume it's correct for all Lotus 9XX belt options.
Regards,
Tim Engel