Page 3 of 6

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 21:45
by alanbell
I had a look at the plugs, they are a healthy brown colour. mike said that as the cr was 12/1 so timing was retarded, I have not any information about jets but could the cr and timing account for the very lean mixture readings at idle. the petrol was v-power.

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 23:24
by fueltheburn
If nothing else has been altered....Compression ratio ... Yes. You are sqaushing 9% more air into the combustion stroke compared to the original HC engine at 11:1 CR

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 23:25
by Lotus-e-Clan
alanbell wrote:I had a look at the plugs, they are a healthy brown colour. mike said that as the cr was 12/1 so timing was retarded, I have not any information about jets but could the cr and timing account for the very lean mixture readings at idle. the petrol was v-power.
The CR and ignition timing per se will not determine what AFR is required for idle.

However they would influence the optimum AFR for max torque for a specific engine (combustion chamber design & SCR /DCR etc will affect optimum ign timing required) - hence there is a normally accepted range of AFRs for best power and torque across a range of differnt engines - you have to find whats best for your spec.

For example my Clan engine has a SCR (static comp ratio) of 11.8 and likes 36 degrees BTDC ignition timing within the power rev range and goes like stink with an AFR of 13.2 within the power/torque rev range (5000 -9000 rpm).

This figure shows relationship between AFR and CO etc ...
Image


This table clarifies AFR and CO% readings ....
Image
From the table you can see it's your 3.2 CO% (AFR 13.3) that makes most sense IF that 's what you have in the max torque range....it's even OK as an idle figure, if a little rich (unnecessary waste of fuel).

A standard Excel SE with an IDLE AFR of 14.2- 14.3 (CO 0.5%) is perfectly achievable. And ideally this is what we should all aim to have come MOT time. :D

The AFR of 20+ makes no sense AT ALL as a useable setting (in any context!) it's completely off the scale! :?

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 19:14
by alanmoss
MOT passed today, no advisories. Emissions data CO 2.848% HC 200 ppm

The carburettors have not been adjusted for several years and like Angus I usually run on 95 ron.

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 17:31
by Jason.goad
Mine Passed it's m.o.t today. No advisories.
CO 3.58% HC 224 ppm.

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:48
by amarshall
MOT Passed again. Emissions data : A little high this year

2.24% CO
1122 ppm HC

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 17:15
by marky
Yes - passed again on Saturday.

CO2 0.482 - don't think it has reached 1% in any of the tests yet!

HC 210

no advisories
Car starting and running great.

Mark.

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 14:20
by Jason.goad
Passed today. Gave it a bit of a carb tune before going

Co. 2.82%
HC 573 ppm

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:33
by shaunw
Passed the MOT today with no advisories and really good HC emissions results which have steadily improved year on year for the last 5 years, hopefully as a result of the hours of work on the carbs, ignition and vacuum pipes and not just a fluke due to the notorious inaccuracy of the testing machines. :lol:

HC 182
CO 2.15

Shaun

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 11:25
by Lotus-e-Clan
Passed MOT today (after a brief fail for a rear bleed nipple not properly nipped D'oh! :roll: )

CO 0.51%
HC 822 (quite a warm day)

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 14:21
by KevW
Great news Peter. I look forward to seeing the motor out and about sometime.

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 16:28
by MrCoolA
KevW wrote:Great news Peter. I look forward to seeing the motor out and about sometime.
as long as it's not a Sunday :wink:

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 19:14
by Lotus-e-Clan
MrCoolA wrote:
KevW wrote:Great news Peter. I look forward to seeing the motor out and about sometime.
as long as it's not a Sunday :wink:
You never know... :D

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 13:50
by amarshall
This year's figures:

CO: 2.93
HC: 64

Carbs were rebuilt last year as they were clogged with silt.

Re: Emissions data

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:23
by marky
MOT pass this morning :D

emissions data ;-

CO = 0.724

HC = 107



Mark.