When you test a progressive spring in a rig and compress it as you describe - you are only testing its COMPOUND RATE in terms of force required to shorten its ENTIRE length in equal steps.richardw wrote:Linear rate springs require equal amounts of additional force to be applied for any given deflection at any point in their compression (until they become coil bound anyway.) This is demonstrated in the table of spring deflections shown in my earlier post.Lotus-e-Clan wrote: What's your definition of 'progressive'?
Progressive rate springs require increasing amounts of additional force to be applied for any given deflection as compression increases. If the spring in my table were progressive, then the additional force required to deflect the spring by a further 1" would progressively increase as the spring is compressed.
ATB Richard
It is not possible to test 'progressive behaviour 'along its length' in a rig like that. It doesn't matter if the progressive design has within its length;- variable coil No, variable wire diameter, or variable coil diameter, the entire spring will compress in equal steps as you found!
Translating progressive spring behaviour to the car....
- During large low resonance inputs, when the car transfers its weight into a corner, the entire spring (progressive or uniform) will shorten according to the compound rate ...it doesn't matter if it is a progressive spring or a uniform spring , the car will lean-in uniformly - not progressively in variable steps.
During small high resonance inputs however, when you ride over rough ground, a progressive spring responds first at the weaker area of the spring;- ie within large diameter coils, region of greater coil number, or region of thinner wire. This will give a softer 'resonance' and better refinement.
I think we have different ideas about progression and your idea doesn't make any sense to me at the moment.