New comer - Progress (edit)

If you spot one, shame them into owning up!!
If you are new to the Lotus position introduce yourself here. Please try to keep your the post to your introduction and your initial question/problems to the right formum.

Moderator: Board Moderators

richardw
Senior Poster
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 15:06
Model: Elite S2.2 Automatic
Colour: Essex Blue
Year: 1981

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by richardw »

Found this regarding the legality of LED headlights which seems to say they should only be fitted (a) with headlamp washers and (b) with remote headlamp adjustment:

The law on aftermarket HID and LED lighting in the UK, in detail, with links and references

ECE Regulations 48 and 98 are the ones which apply to HID headlights, and 48 is the one which deals specifically with how HID headlights must be fitted to be legal.
Headlight washers and automatic levelling

Part 6.2.9. "Other requirements" says: "Dipped-beam headlamps with a light source or LED module(s) producing the principal dipped beam and having a total objective luminous flux which exceeds 2,000 lumen shall only be installed in conjunction with the installation of headlamp cleaning device(s) according to Regulation No. 45.”

Part 6.2.6.2.2 says "... devices which are adjusted manually, either continuously or non-continuously, shall be permitted, provided they have a stop position at which the lamps can be returned to the initial inclination defined in paragraph 6.2.6.1.1. by means of the usual adjusting screws or similar means. These manually adjustable devices shall be operable from the driver's seat."

However, part 6.2.9. says “With respect to vertical inclination the provisions of paragraph 6.2.6.2.2. above shall not be applied for dipped-beam headlamps:

(a) With LED module(s) producing the principal dipped beam; or

(b) With a light source producing the principal dipped beam and having an objective luminous flux which exceeds 2,000 lumen."

So, these laws say you must have washers and automatic levelling only if the light source is more than 2,000 lumens total output, or the light is produced by LEDs (of any brightness), according to (b), above.

But, it's worth pointing out that it’s not possible to measure the total light output accurately at the roadside, or in the MOT station - a light meter can only measure intensity of light at one point, and this rule applies to total light output.

Therefore, as long as you have a manually-operated light levelling system - e.g. a little adjuster wheel on the dashboard - this also seems to be acceptable according to the wording above, unless of course somebody goes to the trouble of having your lights' output measured to test whether they put out more than 2,000 lumens.


The full link is at https://greyhead.co.uk/other-things/are ... ncps5vewv0
Image

User avatar
Hawaiis0
Senior Poster
Posts: 3202
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 18:39
Model: Excel SA No 3
Colour: BRG
Year: 1986
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Hawaiis0 »

Interesting but possibly mis-direction as it is for NEW car approvals only and gererally HID gaseous light too. Still reading for a LED rule.

Quote from DfT

This is because they comply with European type approval regulations. The UK cannot refuse to register a vehicle with a European type approval. These approvals relate to ECE Regulation 98 (for the HID headlamps which are tested on a rig in a laboratory) and ECE Regulation 48 (lighting installation on the vehicle). For the aftermarket, a used vehicle cannot obtain type approval because this only applies to new vehicles.

Retrofitted system and the VOSA MOT

Quote regarding test manual (awaiting comment from resident Examiner) :)

A vehicle may be rejected if the tester finds "a headlamp levelling or cleaning device inoperative or otherwise obviously defective.” (rejection reason 2).

No mention is made of “missing” systems, so it’s acceptable to have no headlamp washers or automatic beam levelling.
Umm! What to do next?

User avatar
Hawaiis0
Senior Poster
Posts: 3202
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 18:39
Model: Excel SA No 3
Colour: BRG
Year: 1986
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Hawaiis0 »

Just to cover the wording definition of 'MAY' above:

'expressing possibility'

Therefore not mandatory.
Umm! What to do next?

User avatar
Alan_M
Senior Poster
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 01:17
Model: Excel SE, Elan SE
Colour: Calypso red, white
Year: 1985
Location: South Wales

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Alan_M »

Mine has passed at least 3 MOTs with LED lights fitted. I have no idea of the total lumens, but they certainly ain’t as stuuupidly, blindingly bright as the ones on Audis that burn the back of your retinas !!

I believe one of the reasons for the washer systems for HID is that dirt on the lens will scatter the light beam so not giving a defined cut off on low beam with potential to dazzle. As our lights remain protected from dirt most of the time, this will be much less of a problem for our pop ups.

User avatar
Hawaiis0
Senior Poster
Posts: 3202
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 18:39
Model: Excel SA No 3
Colour: BRG
Year: 1986
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Hawaiis0 »

Alan_M wrote:Mine has passed at least 3 MOTs with LED lights fitted. ...
Which ones did you fit Alan?
Umm! What to do next?

richardw
Senior Poster
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 15:06
Model: Elite S2.2 Automatic
Colour: Essex Blue
Year: 1981

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by richardw »

Hawaiis0 wrote:Interesting but possibly mis-direction as it is for NEW car approvals only and gererally HID gaseous light too. Still reading for a LED rule.
Don't think so, this is specifically for aftermarket lights - as I read it, HIDs with >2000 lumens and all LEDs:

"The law on aftermarket HID and LED lighting in the UK, in detail, with links and references"

Let's wait for our resident MOT tester!

Richard
Image

User avatar
Alan_M
Senior Poster
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 01:17
Model: Excel SE, Elan SE
Colour: Calypso red, white
Year: 1985
Location: South Wales

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Alan_M »

Hawaiis0 wrote:
Alan_M wrote:Mine has passed at least 3 MOTs with LED lights fitted. ...
Which ones did you fit Alan?
Sorry, don’t know - they were already on the car when I bought it.

User avatar
Hawaiis0
Senior Poster
Posts: 3202
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 18:39
Model: Excel SA No 3
Colour: BRG
Year: 1986
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Hawaiis0 »

Well I fitted one light unit the other day as a test as they only sent one. Not very impressed. The second one arrived today so I fitted it and I found it was much better than the other . Really good white light illumination on dipped and sparkling on main.

I got a duffer with the first one as it seems they had made it upside down.
Umm! What to do next?

User avatar
Hawaiis0
Senior Poster
Posts: 3202
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 18:39
Model: Excel SA No 3
Colour: BRG
Year: 1986
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Hawaiis0 »

Update on the night vision with the new LED headlights.

Main first then dipped

Image

Image
Umm! What to do next?

Pete Boole
Senior Poster
Posts: 2342
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 21:28
Model: Elite
Colour: Monaco White
Year: 1974
Location: Nottingham

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Pete Boole »

Now that looks impressive! Any probs with glare to oncoming drivers? The dipped beam cutoff looks really sharp.

Pete

User avatar
Hawaiis0
Senior Poster
Posts: 3202
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 18:39
Model: Excel SA No 3
Colour: BRG
Year: 1986
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Hawaiis0 »

Pete Boole wrote:Now that looks impressive! Any probs with glare to oncoming drivers? The dipped beam cutoff looks really sharp.

Pete
So far I have had no indications of glare to on coming vehicles. I have set them a short distance when on dipped as shown
Umm! What to do next?

User avatar
Lotus-e-Clan
Senior Poster
Posts: 3967
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 13:25
Model: Excel SE - EWP/Waterless!
Colour: Not Blue or Green
Year: 1989
Location: Swaledale

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Lotus-e-Clan »

Would have been useful if you'd been able to take a before and after picture on the same road/location.

It seems to me that the dipped LED picture shows the offside grass verge lit a little TOO well. The offside cut-off point would be more obvious for normal bulbs....ie normal dipped beams are skewed to the left (nearside).and the offside grass verge would be more poorly lit.

OK, it could be that you are on a very narrow road, but to ensure you don't really dazzle oncoming traffic, the dipped beam pattern should show more of a nearside skew.

Like so (see quick and dirty computer sketch below :lol: ) ....
Image
Peter K

User avatar
bash
Senior Poster
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 15:34
Model: Se, V8
Colour: white
Year: 1986
Location: Doncaster
Contact:

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by bash »

Its David Hockney !!! Can I have your autograph.... on an original.

Bash
You are only young once but you can be juvenile all your life !!

User avatar
DavidOliver
Senior Poster
Posts: 478
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:18
Model: Excel
Colour: Calypso Red
Year: 1985
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by DavidOliver »

Youve´drawn the bonnet louvres in the wrong place, disaster.

Dave the cog.

User avatar
Lotus-e-Clan
Senior Poster
Posts: 3967
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 13:25
Model: Excel SE - EWP/Waterless!
Colour: Not Blue or Green
Year: 1989
Location: Swaledale

Re: New comer - Progress (edit)

Post by Lotus-e-Clan »

bash wrote:Its David Hockney !!! Can I have your autograph.... on an original.

Bash
Ha! I wish! :lol:
DavidOliver wrote:Youve´drawn the bonnet louvres in the wrong place, disaster.

Dave the cog.
Yes that's annoying me too now you've spotted it! :(
Peter K

Post Reply