rear springs

General Elite, Eclat and Excel discussions.

Moderator: Board Moderators

Post Reply
jeff.fenton
Senior Poster
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 20:24

rear springs

Post by jeff.fenton »

I bought on EBay a pair of "Excel rear springs", made by Suplex part no. 16017. There were no spec's listed , and the seller didn't answer my question so presumably dosen't know. The only on line supplier of Suplex I could find, has no reference for this part number. They seem to be of German manufacture, has anyone any information, or could one of our German members access the Suplex catalogue direct please? My car has all new, adjustable shocks, and new Lotus front springs, the rear springs are original and presumably weakened, as the back end dips noticeably after bridges and humps. I don't want to fit the new ones and find they're way too hard for normal road use. Many thanks, Jeff.

User avatar
amarshall
Moderator
Posts: 8296
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 18:09
Model: SE
Colour: Monaco White
Year: 1990
Location: Darlington
Contact:

Re: rear springs

Post by amarshall »

Were they listed as Lotus Excel or just Excel ? (If the latter, it may mean Hyundai...)
https://www.lotusexcel.co.uk/
SORN - just say NO!

jeff.fenton
Senior Poster
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 20:24

Re: rear springs

Post by jeff.fenton »

Hello Angus, they were listed as Lotus Excel SE rear springs. Jeff.

User avatar
Lotus-e-Clan
Senior Poster
Posts: 4566
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 13:25
Model: Excel SE - EWP/Waterless!
Colour: Not Blue or Green
Year: 1989
Location: Swaledale

Re: rear springs

Post by Lotus-e-Clan »

You can work out the spring rate by taking key measurements off your spring.

You want:

wire diameter
Spring Outside diameter
Spring free length
the number of coils

You count the number of coils by starting at the bottom where the wire ends. Then count whole coils upwards - and when you get the the last one, IF the wire end is directly above the lower wire end, its counted as a whole coil. IF it's 180 degrees further around it's a half coil, 90 degrees around, it's a 1/4 coil etc.

You then put the numbers into an online spring rate calculator (google one) to find the spring rate in Ibs/ inch deflection. Then compare to known SE spec.

I can't find the calculator I downloaded years ago - I have the executable - but can't upload it to this site AFAIK.

CLICK here is an online spring rate calculator. Not quite as good as the one I have but it will do for now...

NB, OMIT the compressed length - it still works
Peter K

jeff.fenton
Senior Poster
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 20:24

Re: rear springs

Post by jeff.fenton »

Thanks for that, free length 12.75", coils 10.5,(active coils 8.5?), wire size 0.6175"(assume disregard powder coat thickness?), mean diameter 3.75": if I'm doing this right it comes out at over 450 Lb/inch. I haven't got the Lotus spec' to hand, but think it was in the mid 200's. Any views? Thanks, Jeff.

richardw
Moderator
Posts: 2252
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 15:06
Model: Elite S2.2 Automatic
Colour: Essex Blue
Year: 1981
Location: Worcestershire

Re: rear springs

Post by richardw »

Hi Jeff,

I think that it is unlikely your springs have gone soft. If this were the case, the car would be sitting lower than normal as the weight of the car would compress the softened spring more than normal. Also, I did a test at Lotusbits a while ago on some rusty old Elite springs which, despite their age, were within a pound or two of the rating they were meant to have.

Adjusting the shock absorbers could help with the dipping you are experiencing - have you tried a stiffer setting?

ATB Richard
Image

User avatar
don.hasi
Senior Poster
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 08:03
Model: Eclat S2.2 Riviera
Colour: Black
Year: 1982
Location: Germany RLP/Elsass

Re: rear springs

Post by don.hasi »

jeff.fenton wrote:or could one of our German members access the Suplex catalogue direct please?
They have no online catalogue. The web page of them is rubbish... I have mailed them the question. Lets see, what they are saying.

Regards
Last edited by don.hasi on Mon May 11, 2015 17:20, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImageImageImage

User avatar
Hawaiis0
Senior Poster
Posts: 4494
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 18:39
Model: '86 SA; '89 SA '78 Elite 504
Colour: BRG; Dirty White
Year: 1986
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: rear springs

Post by Hawaiis0 »

jeff.fenton wrote:Thanks for that, free length 12.75", coils 10.5,(active coils 8.5?), wire size 0.6175"(assume disregard powder coat thickness?), mean diameter 3.75": if I'm doing this right it comes out at over 450 Lb/inch. I haven't got the Lotus spec' to hand, but think it was in the mid 200's. Any views? Thanks, Jeff.
from memory the rate is 300/250
Nothing is fool proof. Fools are clever!

User avatar
Lotus-e-Clan
Senior Poster
Posts: 4566
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 13:25
Model: Excel SE - EWP/Waterless!
Colour: Not Blue or Green
Year: 1989
Location: Swaledale

Re: rear springs

Post by Lotus-e-Clan »

jeff.fenton wrote:Thanks for that, free length 12.75", coils 10.5,(active coils 8.5?), wire size 0.6175"(assume disregard powder coat thickness?), mean diameter 3.75": if I'm doing this right it comes out at over 450 Lb/inch. I haven't got the Lotus spec' to hand, but think it was in the mid 200's. Any views? Thanks, Jeff.
Just not sure about your OD measurement of 3.75 ...we need the extreme OD - not a mean OD?

So taking the OD of 4 inches (instead of 3.75) with 10.5 coils my calculator (with Chrome Van steel type coils selected) gives approx 515 LB/in. With 3.75 OD they are nearer 650 LB/in.

Either way, they sound like they are uprated compared to std.

Next thing to do is to measure your std springs and use the same calculator to get a relative view on how much they are uprated.

Are these front or rears?
Peter K

jeff.fenton
Senior Poster
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 20:24

Re: rear springs

Post by jeff.fenton »

Thank you all for your help and suggestions. I went over the measurements and calculations, seems the wire diameter has the largest influence on the result, measured at 15mm with anti-rust primer and powder coating, gives 390 lbs/inch. 14mm would give 290, and 13.5mm 250. Difficult to be exact, but removing a small area of coating back to metal seemed to be over .5mm thick, ie 1mm+ overall. This should bring the spring rate into an acceptable area, so I intend to fit them and hope, will report back. Jeff.

Post Reply